Friday, September 15, 2006

Economic Recovery or Continued Decline?

We continue to see many positive economic articles by mainstream media outlets. It seems that many of the pundits on CNBC, CNN, Fox News, etc. – see our economy on the road to recovery and continue to talk about economic ‘green shoots’. I have listed below some headlines from recent mainstream media articles.

When things really begin to collapse – remember all of these positive articles and all of the positive comments by our political and financial leaders and ask yourself – were they really this blind or was there another agenda at work?

I have added a blog post by Jeff Nielson at the end of this post. Jeff tells us the true state of our economy and where we’re heading.

jg – October 22, 2009

Transport Stocks Blaze Recovery Path
WSJ - October 22, 2009

China Gains Confidence in Recovery
WSJ - October 22, 2009

[Federal Reserve] Beige Book Sees Stabilization Signals
WSJ - October 22, 2009

Business Spending Looks Up
WSJ - October 21, 2009

Commercial Market Gains Footing
WSJ - October 21, 2009

Construction Industry Forecast to Rebound in 2010
WSJ - October 16, 2009

Dow at 10000 as Crisis Ebbs
WSJ - October 15, 2009

Wall Street On Track To Award Record Pay
WSJ - October 14, 2009

Trade Upturn Hints at a Recovery
WSJ - October 12, 2009

Recovery Hopes Stir Markets
WSJ - October 7, 2009

BHP points to signs of broad global recovery
CNN – October 21, 2009

Google: Worst is behind us
CNN – October 21, 2009
Greater Depression for U.S. Rebuts 'Recovery' Talk

By Jeff Nielson

It has gone from irritating to nauseating listening to media market-pumpers talking about an “U.S. economic recovery” which has supposedly already begun. Indeed, the hype has gone from a debate about whether the “recession” is over, to an inane debate about whether the U.S. is experiencing a “V-shaped recovery” or may suffer a “double-dip recession” or W-shaped “recovery”.

In the real world, however, all that has occurred is that an U.S. economic collapse, which was in a near-vertical drop, has eased to a more moderate rate of decline. The “double-dip” talked about by some semi-realistic analysts is in fact nothing more than the ongoing collapse regaining downward momentum. There is no “debate” here. It is a matter of simple arithmetic that the U.S. economy cannot recover.

First of all, in the “big picture”, the U.S.'s $11-trillion economy (all that remains once statistical “padding” is removed) is much too small to service the more than $57 trillion in existing public and private debt. Even if we pretend the U.S. still has a $14 trillion economy (despite the government's own numbers that this economy has shrunk by more than 10%), it is still much too small to service its debts. Meanwhile, lurking in the near future are roughly $70 trillion in additional “unfunded liabilities”.

As I have pointed out on a number of occasions, the U.S. can never afford to raise interest rates again (at least not until after the inevitable national default on its massive debts). Every 1% rise in U.S. interest rates drains over $500 billion per year from the U.S. economy, equivalent to roughly a 5% drop in GDP for every 1% rise in interest rates. It is also inevitable that the bond market will impose much higher interest rates on the U.S. economy – as deficits get more out-of-control (and myopic U.S. creditors finally see the total insolvency of the U.S. economy). Thus, the U.S. is guaranteed to go bankrupt – the only issue is when.

The Obama stimulus package is far too small to stop the current collapse in the U.S. economy. Keep in mind that the same propagandists who claim that Obama's stimulus package would “save” the U.S. economy were saying the same things about the much smaller Bush “stimulus package” - little more than a year ago.

The fact is that the U.S. consumer economy has lost somewhere in the neighborhood of $2 trillion per year in spending power. At the peak of the U.S. housing bubble, home-equity financings injected $840 billion into the economy in one year. Not only has such cash-flow into the U.S. economy completely evaporated, but now the debtors have to pay back the trillions in debt which they squandered.

Contrary to the absurd jobs propaganda, the U.S. economy has already lost somewhere in excess of 15 million jobs already – subtracting at least $1 trillion per year in spending from the economy once the “multiplier effect” is factored in. This disconnect from the real world reached its peak this summer, symbolized by a Reuters article that actually stated that while U.S. unemployment was “improving at the national level” it was getting worse on a state-by-state basis (see “BLS jobs numbers contradict BLS jobs numbers”).

Obviously the U.S. economy is represented by the collective economic performance of its 50 states. Yet in the fantasy-world of U.S. economic propaganda, we are supposed to believe that nationally the U.S. economy can be improving, while state-by-state the economy continues plummeting downward. The only difference between the U.S.'s “national economy” and the “state-by-state economy” is that the federal government has incorporated far more statistical contrivances to distort the numbers.

If the real condition of the U.S. economy is not already evident to people from the information above, certainly the following graphs and data on state tax revenues make things crystal-clear. The Rockefeller Institute (.pdf) recently went back as far as data was available (nearly 50 years) and discovered that the current collapse in state revenues is unprecedented – evidenced by the sickening plunge in these charts.

Again, it is a matter of elementary arithmetic that with U.S. states suffering the worst collapse in revenues on record (and with most states already maximizing their annual borrowing) that only two things can happen. Either U.S. states will have to engage in the most-punishing combination of tax-increases and spending cuts (i.e. lay-offs) on record or the Obama regime will have to dramatically increase federal hand-outs to the individual states.

Currently, in the most-recent fiscal year (ending in June of this year), declines in U.S. state revenues were more than double the amount of “stimulus” they received from the Obama regime. What makes this situation worse, most of this so-called “stimulus” involved either increasing the duration of unemployment insurance in the most-devastated regions and/or providing funds to states whose unemployment benefits were completely spent. There was virtually no money spent on creating jobs (contrary to the promises and claims of the Obama regime).

Given that shortfalls in unemployment insurance funding will be much worse in the current fiscal year, the Obama regime could double “stimulus” hand-outs to the states and still create zero jobs – doing nothing but keeping unemployment insurance payments flowing to the jobless.

This still leaves U.S. states with somewhere around $100 billion in increased deficits which will need to be covered in the current fiscal year (above and beyond their pre-existing structural deficits). Keep in mind that the entire amount of “stimulus” reaching the economy from the Obama “stimulus package” was only about $250 billion this year (using the government's own numbers). Overall, this replaces little more than 10% of the lost spending power from this economy.

The numbers are unequivocal. There is no “economic recovery” taking place in the U.S. This year is much worse than last year – and 2010 will be much worse still. The only thing currently preventing the debt-implosion of the U.S. economy is the Bernanke printing press, and continued, excessive “monetization” of debt is a guarantee of hyperinflation. All claims to the contrary represent wishful thinking or deliberate deceit.

No comments: